Dr Ole Jensen

• Representing a Western European satellite operator in an LCIA arbitration against a Western European aerospace and defence company relating to the sale and purchase of satellites (seat London, English law, amount in dispute GBP 2.1 million)

• Representing a high net worth individual in an ICC arbitration concerning a contested division of complex assets (seat Switzerland, law of a Middle Eastern State, amount in dispute USD 1.2 billion)
• Representing a Latin American mining conglomerate in two parallel ICC arbitrations against a Middle Eastern steel company relating to long-term iron ore supply contracts (seat London, English law, aggregate amount in dispute USD 1.1 billion)
• Representing a US mining consortium in an ICC arbitration against an African company and its US parent company relating to shipping rights allegedly assigned to the former by a West African State (seat Switzerland, law of a West African State, amount in dispute USD 400 million)
• Representing a European pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration against a Japanese pharmaceutical company relating to the payment of royalties under a license agreement after the relevant patents expired (seat London, US, EU and Japanese law, amount in dispute USD 2.7 billion)
• Representing the German branch of a global oil and gas service company in a DIS arbitration and setting aside proceedings against an oil and gas storage company relating to alleged defects in subsurface equipment (seat Germany, German law, amount in dispute EUR 120 million)

‍

• Sole arbitrator in an ICC arbitration in the technology sector between Finnish and German parties concerning an energy storage solution (seat Berlin, German law)
• • Sole arbitrator in an ICC arbitration in the pharmaceutical sector between Korean and Italian parties concerning the conduct of a clinical trial (seat Berlin, German and Italian law)
  • Sole arbitrator in an LCIA arbitration in the technology sector between English and US parties concerning a cryptocurrency venture (seat London, English law)
  • Sole arbitrator in an SCC arbitration in the technology sector between Swedish and Hungarian parties concerning the development of motion tracking software (seat Stockholm, Swedish law)
  • Sole arbitrator in a SIAC arbitration in the technology sector between Australian and Singaporean parties concerning an entertainment platform (seat Singapore, Singapore law)
  • Presiding arbitrator in an ad hoc UNCITRAL arbitration in the construction sector between a Tanzanian party and an international organization concerning agro-processing plants (seat Mauritius, UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts)
  • Sole arbitrator in a VIAC arbitration between Polish, English and Chinese parties in the chemicals industry concerning the supply of raw materials (seat Vienna)
  • Sole arbitrator in a VIAC arbitration in the construction sector between Austrian and Swiss parties concerning a solar energy project (seat Vienna, Austrian law)
  • Sole arbitrator in two parallel DIS arbitrations in the hospitality sector between German parties concerning the lease of hotel premises (seat Stuttgart, German law)
  • Sole arbitrator in a DIS arbitration in the insurance sector between German parties concerning an M&A transaction (seat Hamburg, German law)
  • Sole arbitrator in a DIS arbitration in the financial services sector between German parties concerning an R&D project (seat Munich, German law)
  • Presiding arbitrator in a Hamburg Chamber of Commerce arbitration in the healthcare sector between German parties concerning a corporate dispute (seat Hamburg, German law)

• Tribunal Secretaries International Arbitration, Oxford University Press, 2019, Link
• – Awarded the 2019/2020 DIS Sponsorship Award  
• – “[S]trongly recommended for all members of the arbitration community” – J.   Fellenbaum, Asian Dispute Review  
• – “[C]ontributes to much-needed honesty about secretaries and lays the basis for significant improvements in addressing this subject” – J. Menz, Arbitration International
• – “[P]ivotal for defining the limits and informing the broader arbitration community of the current state of practice” – M. Polkinghorne, Journal of International Arbitration  
• – “[T]rue treasure trove for all those who deal with questions concerning secretaries in international arbitration” – R. Wolff, SchiedsVZ

• • • • 'The Emerging Body of Regulation on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in International Arbitration: An Overview', b-Arbitra | Belgian Review of Arbitration, 2025, 324-337
      • ‘Res Judicata in International Arbitration: The German Perspective’ (with N. Bassiri), in D. De Meulemeester (ed.), Res Judicata in International Arbitration, Kluwer 2025, 71-94
  • • ‘The Law of the Arbitration Agreement Meets Russia-Related Anti-Suit Injunctions: The United Kingdom Supreme Court’s Decision in UniCredit Bank GmbH v RusChemAlliance LLC’ (with M. Scherer, C. Kalelioğlu), IPRax 2025, 200-211
    • • ‘Regulating the Use of Artificial Intelligence in International Arbitration: The EU AI Act and Beyond’ (with M. Scherer, R. Childree), Cahiers de l’arbitrage, 2024, 653
    • ‘Kartellrecht und Schiedsverfahren’ (with F. Schwarz), in H.-G. Kamann, S. Ohlhoff and S. Völcker (eds), Kartellverfahren und Kartellprozess, C.H. Beck (2^nd ed) 2024, 1545-1570

• ‘Tribunal Secretary’, in F. Ferrari, F. Rosenfeld and F. Ragno (eds), Elgar Concise Encyclopedia of International Commercial Arbitration, Edward Elgar 2025, 423-426
• ‘Forced Joinder: Arbitration Without Privity or Consent in Disguise?’ (with M. Scherer), in S. Brekoulakis and R. Weeramantry (eds), Achieving the Arbitration Dream: Liber Amicorum for Professor Julian D.M. Lew KC, Kluwer, 2023, 207-218
• ‘Die Digitalisierung der Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit’ (with M. Scherer), in T. Riehm and S. Dörr (eds), Handbuch Digitalisierung und Zivilverfahren, De Gruyter, 2023, 549-625
• ‘Zuspruch von Bitcoin in einem Schiedsspruch als Ordre public-Verstoß?’ (with D. Böckenförde), Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft, 2022, RIW 793-796
• ‘Consolidation, Joinder and Intervention in International Arbitration: A Comparative Analysis of Contemporary Approaches’ (with M. Scherer), 26 ZZPInt, Zeitschrift für Zivilprozess International, 2021, 173-202
• ‘Neues zum Sekretär des Schiedsgerichts – Entwicklungen in Rechtsprechung und schiedsinstitutioneller Regulierung im Laufe des Yukos Aufhebungsverfahrens‘, SchiedsVZ, German Arbitration Journal, 2022, 275-286
• ‘Empirical Research on the Alleged Invalidity of Arbitration Agreements: Success Rates and Applicable in Setting Aside and Enforcement Proceedings’ (with M. Scherer), 39 Journal of International Arbitration, 2022, 331-350
• ‘Of Implied Choices and Close Connections: Two Pervasive Issues Concerning the Law Governing the Arbitration Agreement’ (with M. Scherer), in J. Bedard and P. Pearsall (eds), State of Arbitration: Essays in Honour of Professor George Bermann, Juris, 2022, 667-680
• ‘Towards a Harmonized Theory of the Law Governing the Arbitration Agreement’ (with M. Scherer), Indian Journal of Arbitration Law, 2021, 1-16
• ‘The Law Governing the Arbitration Agreement: A Comparative Analysis of the United Kingdom Supreme Court’s Decision in Enka v Chubb’ (with M. Scherer), IPRax, 2021, 177-187
• ‘Aligning Arbitrator Assistance with the Parties' Legitimate Expectations’, 38 ASA Bulletin, 2020, 375-395
• ‘The Arbitrator’s Mandate to Facilitate Settlement’ (with K. P. Berger), 40 Fordham International Law Journal, 2017, 887-917, Link
• ‘Due Process Paranoia and the Procedural Judgment Rule: A Safe Harbour for Procedural Management Decisions by International Arbitrators’ (with K. P. Berger), 32 Arbitration International, 2016, 415-435, Link
• ‘Die Auslegung von Investitionsschutzabkommen am Beispiel der „umbrella clause“: Rechtssicherheit durch höhere Präzision’, RIW, Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft, 2016, 277-286
• ‘Setting Aside Arbitral Awards in Model Law Jurisdictions: The Singapore Approach from a German Perspective’, 4 European International Arbitration Review, 2015, 55-80

• • ‘Berlin Court Confirms Binding Nature of Arbitration Agreement in Sanctions-related Dispute with Russian Party’, German Arbitration Digest, GAD 2024, 1, Link
• • ‘In a “First” Worldwide, Austrian Supreme Court Confirms Arbitral Tribunal’s Power to Hold Remote Hearings Over One Party’s Objection and Rejects Due Process Concerns’ (with M. Scherer, F. Schwarz, H. Ortner), Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 24 October 2020, Link
• ‘CETA’s Dispute Settlement Mechanism Compatible with EU Law – A Closer Look at the CJEU’s Opinion’ (with G. Adler), Lexis PSL, 7 June 2019
• ‘DIS Autumn Conference 2018: Art-Related Dispute Resolution’ SchiedsVZ, German Arbitration Journal, 2019, 89-92
• ‘Law, Practice, and Procedure of Arbitration by Sundra Rajoo (2nd edn, LexisNexis 2017) – Book Review’ TDM, Transnational Dispute Management, 2018, 1-15
• ‘It Takes Pressure to Form Diamonds: The Changing Landscape of Dispute Resolution and Its Implications for International Arbitration’ (with K. P. Berger), Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 23 May 2016, Link
• ‘The Swiss Federal Tribunal Addresses the Role of Secretaries and “Legal Consultants” to an Arbitral Tribunal’, 33 IBA Arbitration News, 2016, 66-69